Government Intervention and Asset Recovery Challenges
Colonial Life Insurance Company (CLICO) International Life Insurance Limited, like its sister company BAICO, was placed under judicial management in 2009 following the collapse of parent company CL Financial Group. Unlike BAICO, CLICO received substantial support from the Trinidad and Tobago government, which took control and injected capital. This government intervention significantly improved outcomes: CLICO policyholders recovered approximately 15-60% of policy values, generally higher than BAICO's 10-50% recovery rates.
Content is only available to authorized viewers. Contact the Administrator.
Contact AdministratorExplore other landmark Caribbean judicial management cases with similar themes and challenges
A 15-Year Judicial Management Journey
Key Themes:
Regional Airline Judicial Management
Key Themes:
Political Patronage and Regulatory Capture
Key Themes:
Multi-Jurisdictional Coordination
All three cases involved complex coordination across multiple Caribbean jurisdictions with different legal frameworks and regulatory authorities.
Illiquid Asset Challenges
Each case faced significant challenges in realizing value from illiquid assets including real estate, aircraft, and related-party receivables.
Stakeholder Impact
Thousands of stakeholdersâpolicyholders, employees, creditorsâexperienced significant financial hardship and uncertainty throughout the proceedings.
Articles, documents, legislation, and other materials related to this case
Primary insurance legislation governing CLICO operations in St. Kitts and Nevis
View ResourceThis case highlights the issues related to what can be viewed as Non-Arm's Length Transactions and the efforts of the Judicial Manager to right this historical wrong. This transaction involved a written contract for the sale of CLICO's lands situated at Douglas-Estate, St. Kitts, comprising 40.19 acres. The agreement aforesaid is dated 2nd July 2010 which is prior to the date on which the company was placed under judicial management and at which time, CLICO was being managed under section 57 of the Insurance Act. Despite of efforts from the Judicial Manager at the time (2012), who contended "that if the Agreement is enforced it would be detrimental to the interest of the policy holders. He deposed further that he has made application to the court as part of his report that the agreement be cancelled either unconditionally or subject to such consideration as the court may deem necessary. There was no objection from the Registrar of Insurance to the challenge from the SSB even though they ought to have understood the negative impacts that a win for the Applicant (SSB) would have meant to the CLICO policyholders. His efforts were not heeded, and the Judge approved the sale, which led to the loss of over 15 million dollars to CLICO's policy holders. This case is a lesson on conflict of interest, breach of fiduciary responsibility and abuse of power. This case lays the groundwork for the fight to recover the assets which were taken from the policy holders and stakeholders of CLICO.
View Resource